The Election for president 2012 has Begun. I am in it to win it!

The reelection games have begun.
	I am taking FCC, ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX, and PBS into federal district court, challenging the FCC jurisdiction over our First Amendment right to give a speech, along with the licenses of all the networks, for their "willful and repeated failure to allow access," during the last election, and more.
	Here is a chunk from the brief I have prepared challenging FCC jurisdiction about this issue. A three judge panel is required by law to hear the case (and read the following):
	43.) Mootness is not applicable to this case, or to any First Amendment election case. Flory v. F.C.C., 528 F 2d 124 (1975), decided by learnéd Judge PELL, is the benchmark decision on mootness. Defendants’ may claim that, in spite of an Declaratory Judgment against them, because the 2008 presidential election has passed, relative to petitioner’s reasonable requests for access, even though the networks arbitrarily ditched his requests, before the election was decided, that relief cannot be granted after the election, thus, petitioner’s access requests are moot. However, in today’s election-cycled political TV world, relative to pre-election media access for political speech, as viable spectrum has become available, bandwidth scarcity, inhibiting television programming, has dissolved.
	44-b.) In today’s televised world hundreds of channels daily compete for demographic viewing groups. Media coverage of campaigns for federal offices, including even news of this petition on cable TV and broadcast television jumps editorial discretion, for political coverage is an round-the-clock full time money making competitive enterprise for all mass media broadcasters. Cable networks compete in a cycle for breaking stories and run, side-by- side, competitive opinion shows on political party, congressional and presidential contest politics.
	45.) Petitioner, actively a candidate for U.S. president, brings to our Red Lion “marketplace of ideas” (supra, Para. 10.), a work of art petitioner characterizes the “Vehicle for World Peace.” “The Book ov Lev It A Kiss,” 112 hand lettered double column pages, is a spoken poem for all mankind; created to perform from dusk until dawn, on whirled wide television, for all the worlds’ peoples to be part of all at once, with every line a delicate sensible “mull tie ling well “ rhyme. This prophetic Television Scripture is an art above the pay grades of president Obama and his contenders. The foretelling of events, in advance, with hand-lettered words, in original rhyme streams of refracted lyric chants, is a talent exclusive to petitioner.
	The passage, herewith below, describes a catastrophic oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, led into, with words playing on NYC Mayor John V. Lindsay’s name. Mayor Lindsay needed the support of Standard Oil wealthy Nelson D. Rockefeller, The Rock of Manhattan, to follow him, as NY state’s next governor. Nelson Rockefeller’s grandfather, John D. Rockefeller, founded Standard Oil of Ohio, in 1870, which eventually was acquired by the British Petroleum Company, known today as BP.
	LYN ZEE IS OIL WITH
	OUT THE OLD RICH
	MAN
	ESSO AND TEX LEF
	GO GULF MY FREN
	WE ARE TANG ELD
	UP TO OUR ASS IN
	THE EAST
	OIL SPILL ON WA DUR
	LOOK OUT BRUTH ER
	EV RE GEE EYE JOE
	WHO SED DON’T DOO
	KNOW DRILL LYN FIR OIL
	HEEZ THE WUN THAT
	LOST IS JOB DE
	ENG LISH KA LYN IZE
	FOR IN THE COLON
	ANNE RUB IT IN
	FRUNNA YER EYES.
	Michael Stephen Levinson ©1971 The Book ov Lev It A Kiss
	46.) Petitioner holds the view, his, by heart, Homeric performance of his prophetic art, “The Book ov Lev It A Kiss,” dusk until dawn, will constitute the first peaceful night in more than five thousand years of recorded history on Good Ship Mother Earth, as all the world’s peoples will be participating together, in the same world event at the same time –petitioner’s television performance—spanning all of our radio and television channels at once, whirled wide, an occurrence yet to have taken place in our world history. The potential in our political process for the rustling of all humanity together, in order to change the course of human history on Good Ship Mother Earth, having yet to be initiated from the office of president, can only be judged by District Court an exception to the doctrine of mootness as applied to elections for U.S. president, for petitioner’s candidacy for US president is active, not moot.
	47.) Petitioner’s prophetic World Peace conception—his singular plan to deliver the world to peace, his delivery plan, upon election to the office of U.S. president cannot be mooted. This potential performance of petitioner’s dusk until dawn television program is an issue for the American people to decide for themselves for “[i]t is the right of the viewers and listeners, not the right of the broadcasters which is paramount . . It is the purpose of the First Amendment to preserve an uninhibited marketplace of ideas in which truth will ultimately prevail;” and the Court’s duty is to protect that right. Red Lion teaches further, “It is the right of the public to receive suitable access to social, political, esthetic, moral, and other ideas and experience which is crucial here,” (footnote here) especially in the unending non-stop contest of political player positioning to run for and become the next U.S. president.
	48.) Petitioner, the author of prophetic works, is non-stop a candidate for United States president, seeking our presidency to give the world His inspired, carefully crafted plan for delivering Good Ship Mother Earth to peace. American people, upon an unrehearsed view of petitioner spouting His prophetic works, might be in agreement that, “no particular exercise of the imagination is required to believe”? that one man telling his vision, on world television, from dusk until dawn, with every delicate line, a sensible multilingual rhyme, to settle the World Peace issue, cannot be arranged to come over all the airwaves and reach every soul in the living world, but from the office of U.S. president.
	49.) Furthermore, the American people, engaged in petitioner’s televised scripture, engaged in petitioner’s retelling his tale of Adman and Even in the Gar Den ov Edum, and engaged with world events as described by petitioner years in advance, amongst prophetically foretold occurrences: President Nixon described departing the White House, disgraced, before the end of his 2nd term; the arctic ice caps’ melt; the first Persian Gulf War: when the war would occur, why the Gulf War would be fought, who would be doing the fighting and how the war would turn out; the oil spill disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, bringing ecologic havoc; (Para. 45 supra), all of these foretold descriptions and more; that in light of the historic occurrences described by petitioner with poetic mastery rivaling old blind Homer, an imaginative stretch is not required to hold, the citizenry might agree, and District Court concur, that petitioner, denied his sacrosanct First Amendment right to access during his campaign, cannot now be required to stick fast to some arbitrary date, signaling an “official” start of the presidential race, for petitioner’s affirmative access right to be engaged, when today’s campaign cycles for office are unceasing.
	Petitioner is entitled to declare his candidacy via live speech, on television, for both the Democrat and Republican party nominations, including Independent voter’s selection, just as petitioner, by virtue of his bona fide candidacy, is also qualified to show and tell his plan on how we save our Gulf of Mexico from future oil spill destruction, and to expound on his non-partisan programs for delivering world wide economic harmony, upon petitioner’s election to our U.S. presidency, as it is commonly recognized that campaigns for federal elections in 2010 America, are being now conducted by incumbents via § 315(a) exempt television uses, in an every day on-going non-stop campaign cycle.
	I spent in legal hours, though I am not a lawyer, more than a hundred grand writing this 300 + page brief. These networks are all going to have their licenses REVOKED. The viewers and listeners have rights. I am going to reestablish those rights, earning the privilege to place my hand on a bible and take an oath to defend those constitutional rights, as your president.
	michaelslevinson.com